The failure of the Copenhagen agreement a victory?

 

Copenhagen agreement, is a failure in the victory, or the crisis a turning point? Can be described as a matter of opinion.

However, this is a rare World War II, scene 60 years, the summit in Copenhagen, the last 12 hours, the world's major leaders of powerful countries and the most poor and backward countries to meet the leaders of the shuttle, to a common goal: to take action against global warming of. The end result though not perfect, but in a sense, bringing new hope for survival on earth as important as the victory of World War II and the Cold War's end.

There is no doubt that U.S. President Barack Obama and Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao is the summit of the two stars. They represent two different stages of development of the national camp, on behalf of two different systems, representing two different development models, and even on behalf of two different ideologies, but they live together on this planet, it must hand in hand years, led the anti-greenhouse effect globally.

The summit, 10 days, the argument is not a moment stopped, resulting in the final of the international community has been pessimistic, predicting the summit will be aborted. But in the end, the U.S. and Chinese leaders determined finalized, each concession, putting an end by the media called the "Sino-US contest at loggerheads" situation, Obama announced that China, India, Brazil, South Africa, leaders do not reach a legal binding force, yet practical solutions.

Western countries led by the United States agreed to raise 100 billion yuan every year to help the poor countries to cope with climate warming, until 2020. This is tantamount to recognition of the development of Western greed is a climate warming to historical reasons, also need to take the responsibility and make compensation, which is really out of the Western Center on the West a key step in the correct theory.

Similarly, China agreed to the implementation of the international community in their emission reduction targets can be confirmed that some degree of supervision is tantamount to recognition of China as a great country needs to comply with internationally recognized standards of transparency, scientific standard, which is really out of China's special theory of psychological locked out of the country's key step.

When the United States stepped down, China into the world, globalization movement will undergo significant changes, from the common to deal with the financial crisis, to the Copenhagen Summit, the theme of globalization, including economic development, environmental protection, and finally beyond the war, consciousness patterns, religious strife, the world's most concerned about the topic. This may be the human to give their best New Year gift.

With the "imminent" It's four words describe the atmosphere of this meeting can be described as the most appropriate. A new global campaign, in just two weeks to complete schematic of the agreement, but also have legal effect, there is to more than "bolt speed" (100 meters sprint world record), are now able to been reached without any implementation of the binding emission reduction targets and no political agreement has been regarded as fortunate.

Recalling the summit stalemate reasons, not countries do not form a consensus on the need for emission reductions, but mainly three conflicts, the United States, China and Africa, represented by the developing countries, their needs for assistance in funding and the responsibilities and obligations of the entanglement endlessly.

The United States is the most disappointing, Obama came to power, the surface adopt a different line of George W. Bush, but a case of the actual situation, is simply "follow his steps." Issues in the Afghan war, Obama wore the Nobel Peace Prize laureate, or send more troops carried out the expansion of the war policy; the Copenhagen agreement, the Government still does not agree with Obama before the "Kyoto Protocol." In order to cover up their own can not bear, but also put the blame on the heads of China that China's commitment to emission reduction standards, difficult to verify. This implies that China would say one thing and do another, the United States would face a significant loss.

The most difficult challenges facing China. United States-led Western countries, with China's economic rise and waste a huge amount of ground, forcing China to develop a higher row of waste indicators, and to accept the test of the international community, are neither reported figures; the backward countries of the African-led, China has not only requires the recipient to give up row of waste, but also bear the responsibility to help them.

In this enormous pressure, China has taken to resist the United States to meet the strategy of developing countries, the statement should be from the Western countries, China will receive financial assistance, transfer to the backward countries, but also lead a technical boycott backward countries require the Western countries commitment to a greater amount of assistance.

China to give up the West's environmental assistance There are three reasons: First, China's GDP is being driven on ultra-United States, blindly asking for funds, will trigger a strong reaction from people in Western countries; addition, China has also become a clean energy sectors of the big country asked Western countries to provide free technical resources for environmental reasons are not sufficient; the three Western countries, aid is a row of the total amount of waste, the Chinese cut a piece of cake, other backward countries would lose a chunk, it is better, "Jiehuaxianfo" it as a backward state of China's indirect assistance to more positive political effect.

Of course, the most important reason is that, if China were to receive assistance, will be tested by others to perform the duties, which undoubtedly is "controlled by others," from China's great power, pride and self-strategy, are unacceptable.