Any so-called greenhouse gas emissions on a major discovery, are very likely Mangrenmoxiang one-sided results. Especially with regard to the evaluation of methane emissions: the one hand, ignoring the time scale exaggerated the role of greenhouse gases, methane is unscientific. On the other hand, for methane emissions and the Earth's temperature increase of the phenomenon of synchronization, we can not simply conclusion. Is well known that organic carbon in the gasification process, in the end the release of carbon dioxide, or methane gas, mainly depends on the conversion when the environmental conditions. Increase in the Earth's carbon dioxide caused by the concentration of oxygen fell and the environment temperature, just make some of this should be translated into carbon dioxide, organic carbon, had converted to methane gas. Thus, in the end was caused by methane emissions from the Earth's temperature, or the excessive global greenhouse gas emissions and temperature rise caused an increase in methane emissions, or to be further explored.
, So the discovery of rice fields, reservoirs and wetlands and even the tropical rain forest will emit methane gas, on the accused that they are a major source of greenhouse gases is very unfair. Because it is possible they may emit methane, it is precisely because they are playing a huge solid carbon (carbon sinks) role. Can not be denied, they are first and foremost a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions.
No comments:
Post a Comment